December 22, 2017 release notes



  • Integrations 2.0 for Jira now supports mapping and syncing the Jira "Priority" field.
  • Integrations 2.0 for Rally now supports mapping and syncing the following Rally planning fields: Value Score, Risk Score, WSJF Score, Refined Estimate. 
  • Feature history now includes an audit log when a file is attached to the feature. 


  • The following fixes apply to integrations 2.0:
    • In some edge cases, integrations using templates were not adhering to template mapping settings, even when configured to do so. 
    • An error occurred with integrations 2.0 when mapped field types changed from constants to non-constants. 
    • An error prevented non-Administrators from sending custom user field values to external systems via integrations 2.0.
    • Custom fields for master features were not showing as mappable in integrations 2.0. 
  • Bad links were presented in email notifications for comments left on a To-do within a goal or initiative
  • Activating a custom field within a custom field layout via drag-and-drop was very slow if the user had searched for a particular field.
  • Feature tags were not correctly sent to GitHub on initial sync. 
  • Searches containing colons were not returning valid search results.
  • Images embedded in an idea's private comment were not properly displayed within the comment.
  • Trailing spaces at the end of a product line name caused the hierarchy report to fail to load. 
  • PDF export of pivot reports displayed a scrollbar at the bottom of the PDF.
  • When pivot reports were customized to "Use swimlanes for first row headers" and "Color by", the "Color by" settings were not applied to the object appearing in the first row.
  • In reports, it is possible for items with identical names to link to different records, and this was causing duplicates in reporting legends. This can occur trivially by using release phases from a template. The logic behind the legend has been enhanced to make every effort to condense duplicates.

Was this article helpful?
0 out of 0 found this helpful